keepcalculator

06 Numbers and Powers

Everything as Code: What It Means for Modern Engineering

Card No. 06·13880 · Updated · Standard formula, shown below

Everything as Code (EaC) is the practice of defining and managing all infrastructure, configuration, policies, and even documentation through machine-readable code files, rather than manual processes or point-and-click interfaces. In modern engineering, it means that every change to a system is made by editing a text file, reviewed through version control, and applied automatically, which brings the same discipline used in application development to the entire operational environment. This article explains what EaC covers, why it matters, how to adopt it, and the common pitfalls to avoid.

Background: From Manual Ops to Declarative Systems

Before the cloud era, servers were physical boxes configured by hand. Administrators logged in, installed packages, edited config files, and hoped nothing broke. The rise of virtualization and cloud computing made it possible to create servers on demand, but early cloud adoption still involved clicking through web consoles. This approach did not scale: a company with hundreds of servers could not manually ensure each one had the same security patches or application settings.

The DevOps movement pushed for treating operations as a software problem. Tools like Puppet, Chef, and Ansible introduced the idea of writing configuration in code, and later Terraform and AWS CloudFormation extended this to infrastructure provisioning. The key shift was from imperative instructions (“run this command, then that command”) to declarative definitions (“the system should look like this”). Today, Everything as Code broadens that mindset to every aspect of a system: not just servers and networks, but also CI/CD pipelines, security policies, database schemas, and even team processes.

Core Components of Everything as Code

EaC is an umbrella term that includes several specific practices. The most common ones are:

  • Infrastructure as Code (IaC) – defining servers, networks, load balancers, and other resources in code (e.g., Terraform, CloudFormation, Pulumi).
  • Configuration as Code – managing application settings, feature flags, and environment variables in versioned files (e.g., Ansible, Kubernetes ConfigMaps, Helm charts).
  • Policy as Code – encoding security and compliance rules in code (e.g., Open Policy Agent, HashiCorp Sentinel, AWS Service Control Policies).
  • Pipeline as Code – defining CI/CD workflows as code (e.g., GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, Jenkinsfile).
  • Documentation as Code – writing docs in plain-text formats like Markdown or AsciiDoc, stored in the same repo and built with the same tooling.

These practices share a common foundation: everything lives in a version control system (usually Git), changes go through code review, and automated tools apply the changes.

How Everything as Code Works in Practice

The workflow is straightforward but requires a cultural shift. A typical process looks like this:

  1. Define – Write a file that describes the desired state of a resource. For example, a Terraform file might declare a virtual machine with 2 CPUs, 8 GB RAM, and a specific OS image.
  2. Review – Submit the change as a pull request. Teammates review the diff, check for errors, and discuss the impact.
  3. Test – Automated tests run against the change. This could be a syntax check, a linting rule, or a full deployment to a staging environment.
  4. Apply – Once merged, a CI/CD pipeline runs the code to create or update the actual resources. The tool compares the current state to the desired state and makes only the necessary changes.
  5. Audit – The version control history provides a complete audit trail: who changed what, when, and why.

For example, a team using Kubernetes might store all YAML manifests in a Git repo. When a developer wants to change the number of replicas for a service, they edit the deployment.yaml file, open a PR, and after approval, a GitOps tool like Argo CD or Flux syncs the change to the cluster. If something goes wrong, they can revert the commit to roll back.

Benefits: Why Teams Adopt EaC

The advantages go beyond just automating tasks. The most cited benefits are:

  • Consistency – The same code produces the same environment every time, eliminating configuration drift where servers slowly become different from each other.
  • Speed – Provisioning a new environment that took days of manual work can be done in minutes with a single command.
  • Reliability – Because changes are reviewed and tested, the risk of human error decreases significantly.
  • Auditability – Every change is logged in version control, making it easy to answer “what changed?” during an incident or audit.
  • Collaboration – Developers, operations, and security teams can all review the same code, breaking down silos.
  • Disaster recovery – If a region fails, you can recreate the entire infrastructure from code in a new region, as long as the code is stored safely.

Common Challenges and Misconceptions

Adopting EaC is not without friction. Teams often hit the following issues:

  • Learning curve – Ops teams may not be familiar with Git, and developers may not understand infrastructure concepts. Training and pairing help.
  • Secret management – You must not put passwords or API keys in the code. Use a secret manager (like HashiCorp Vault, AWS Secrets Manager, or Kubernetes Secrets) and reference them in code.
  • State management – Tools like Terraform keep a state file that maps code to real resources. If the state is corrupted or out of sync, it can cause issues. Use remote state storage with locking.
  • Over-abstraction – Some teams create overly complex modules that are hard to understand. Start with simple, readable code and refactor when needed.
  • “It’s just YAML” – A common misconception is that EaC is only about writing YAML files. In reality, it requires a robust CI/CD pipeline, testing, and a culture of review.

Another misconception is that EaC eliminates the need for operations staff. In fact, it changes their role: instead of manually fixing servers, they write code that prevents problems and respond to alerts when something unexpected happens.

How to Choose the Right Tools

There is no one-size-fits-all toolset. The right choice depends on your existing stack, team skills, and the complexity of your environment. Here are some guiding factors:

  • Cloud provider – If you are all-in on AWS, CloudFormation or AWS CDK may integrate best. For multi-cloud, Terraform or Pulumi are more portable.
  • Language preference – Terraform uses HCL (HashiCorp Configuration Language), while Pulumi lets you use Python, TypeScript, Go, or C#. If your team is strong in a general-purpose language, Pulumi may be easier.
  • Kubernetes usage – If you run Kubernetes, consider GitOps tools like Argo CD or Flux, which continuously sync your cluster to a Git repo.
  • Maturity and support – Terraform has a huge provider ecosystem and community. Newer tools may have fewer examples and integrations.
  • Compliance needs – If you need to enforce policies, look for tools that integrate with policy engines like OPA.

A practical approach is to start with a small, non-critical project, compare two tools side-by-side, and get feedback from the team before standardizing.

Adoption Strategy and Best Practices

Implementing EaC across an organization is a journey. A phased approach reduces risk:

  1. Start small – Pick one service or environment (e.g., a staging server) and define it in code. Get comfortable with the workflow.
  2. Establish conventions – Agree on naming conventions, file structure, and code review rules. Create templates or modules for common patterns.
  3. Integrate with CI/CD – Automate linting, validation, and deployment. Make sure every PR runs a plan or dry-run so reviewers see the impact.
  4. Gradually expand – Move more resources into code, starting with the most stable and critical ones. Keep a rollback plan.
  5. Train and document – Provide training for all teams involved. Write clear READMEs and runbooks.

Best practices include storing code in a dedicated repo (or a monorepo), using environment-specific variables, and never editing resources manually outside of code. If someone changes a resource via the console, the code and reality will diverge, which defeats the purpose.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Everything as Code the same as Infrastructure as Code?

No. Infrastructure as Code is a subset that focuses on infrastructure resources (servers, networks, storage). Everything as Code is broader – it includes configuration, policies, pipelines, and documentation. IaC is often the first step, but EaC extends the same principles to every part of the system.

Do I need to be a developer to use EaC?

Not necessarily, but you need to be comfortable with command-line tools, text editors, and version control. Many tools like Terraform and Ansible have a learning curve, but they are designed for operations professionals. As EaC becomes more common, basic coding skills are becoming a standard part of ops roles.

What happens if I need to make a one-off emergency change?

In an ideal EaC setup, you would still make the change through code, even in an emergency, because that keeps the system consistent. However, if it is truly urgent, you can make a manual change and immediately follow up with a code change to reflect it. The key is to never leave the manual change undocumented.

How do I handle secrets in code?

Never store secrets in plain text in your code files. Use a secrets manager and reference it in your code. For example, Terraform can read from Vault or AWS Secrets Manager, and Kubernetes can use Secrets objects. The secret values are injected at runtime, not stored in the repo.

Is EaC only for cloud environments?

No. You can use EaC for on-premises servers, network devices, and even databases. Tools like Ansible can manage physical or virtual machines, and network configuration can be automated with tools like Ansible or vendor-specific APIs. The principles apply anywhere you have repetitive, manual configuration.

What is the difference between declarative and imperative?

Declarative code describes the desired end state (“I want 5 web servers”), and the tool figures out how to get there. Imperative code lists the exact steps (“create server, install nginx, copy config”). Most modern EaC tools are declarative, which is more robust because the tool can detect and fix drift.

Related

Method: the standard formula for this calculation, rounded as each result states. See how the calculators work or report an error.

More cards in this drawer

The whole Numbers and Powers drawer →