keepcalculator

06 Numbers and Powers

How to Choose an Infrastructure as Code Tool

Card No. 06·67096 · Updated · Standard formula, shown below

Choosing an infrastructure as code (IaC) tool for your team is about matching the tool’s model to your team’s skills, your cloud environment, and how you want to manage state. This guide walks you through the decision process step by step, from defining your requirements to running a proof of concept, so you can pick a tool that your team will actually adopt and maintain.

What You’ll Need

  • A clear list of the infrastructure you manage (cloud providers, on-prem, Kubernetes, etc.)
  • Knowledge of your team’s programming languages and scripting experience
  • Access to a test environment (free tier or sandbox) for hands-on trials
  • Time to evaluate 2–3 tools side by side

Step-by-Step

  1. List your infrastructure and workflows. Write down every cloud provider, service, and resource type you use. Note how often you deploy, whether you need to handle multiple environments (dev, staging, prod), and whether you have existing automation scripts or CI/CD pipelines.
  2. Assess your team’s skill set. If your team is strong in Python, tools like Pulumi or CDK (for AWS) will feel natural. If they prefer declarative YAML, Terraform or CloudFormation is a better fit. If they’re mostly ops-focused with little coding, a tool like Terraform (with HCL) or Ansible might be easier to learn than a full programming language.
  3. Decide on declarative vs. imperative. Declarative tools (Terraform, CloudFormation, Pulumi in declarative mode) let you specify the desired end state and the tool figures out the steps. Imperative tools (Ansible, Chef, Puppet) require you to script the exact steps. Declarative is generally preferred for infrastructure provisioning because it’s idempotent and easier to review.
  4. Evaluate state management. Terraform uses a state file to track resources; you’ll need remote state storage (e.g., S3, Azure Storage) with locking. Pulumi also uses state, but can store it in their cloud or self-hosted. CloudFormation manages state for you. Consider how comfortable your team is with managing state files and locking.
  5. Check cloud provider support. If you’re all-in on AWS, CloudFormation or AWS CDK may be the most integrated. If you’re multi-cloud, Terraform and Pulumi have the broadest provider support. Look at the provider documentation for the specific services you use—some tools lag behind on new features.
  6. Consider the learning curve and community. Terraform has the largest community and most examples. Pulumi is growing but has fewer resources. CloudFormation is AWS-specific but well documented. Ansible is great for configuration management but not ideal for provisioning cloud resources. Look at the size of the community, the quality of docs, and the availability of modules or packages.
  7. Think about testing and CI/CD integration. How will you test your IaC? Terraform has `terraform plan` and `terraform validate`, and you can run tools like Checkov or tfsec for security. Pulumi supports unit testing with your language’s test framework. CloudFormation has cfn-lint. Ensure the tool can integrate with your CI/CD system (GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, Jenkins) via CLI or native plugins.
  8. Run a proof of concept. Pick 2–3 finalists and build a small, realistic stack (e.g., a VPC with an EC2 instance and an S3 bucket) in a sandbox. Have each team member spend a few hours with each tool. Compare how easy it was to write, review, and update the code. Pay attention to error messages and debugging experience.
  9. Evaluate cost and licensing. Terraform is open-source (BSL license), but the CLI is free. Pulumi has a free tier and paid editions. CloudFormation is free (you pay for the resources). Ansible is open-source. Check if any features you need are only in paid tiers.
  10. Make a decision and set standards. Choose the tool that best fits your team’s skills, your infrastructure, and your workflow. Then create conventions: how to structure directories, name resources, manage state, and review changes. Document these standards and provide a starter template.

Common Mistakes

  • Choosing based on hype or a single blog post. What works for a large tech company may not suit your team. Always test with your own use cases.
  • Ignoring the learning curve. If your team is not familiar with the language or DSL, adoption will be slow. Budget for training and pair programming.
  • Not planning for state management. With Terraform, if you don’t set up remote state and locking, multiple team members will corrupt the state file.
  • Using a configuration management tool for provisioning. Ansible can provision, but it’s not idempotent in the same way as Terraform. Mixing provisioning and configuration can lead to complexity.
  • Forgetting about modularity. If you don’t plan for reusable modules, you’ll end up with duplicated code and drift.

Tips

  • Start small. Migrate one service or environment first, then expand.
  • Use version control for all IaC code from day one. Review changes like code.
  • Leverage existing modules or packages (Terraform Registry, Pulumi Packages) to avoid reinventing the wheel.
  • Implement a CI/CD pipeline that runs `plan` or `preview` on pull requests to catch errors early.
  • Keep your IaC code and configuration in the same repo if possible, so changes are atomic.
  • Invest in training. A few hours of official training can save weeks of trial and error.

Troubleshooting

If your proof of concept hits a wall, here’s what to do:

  • The tool doesn’t support a resource you need. Check the provider’s issue tracker or roadmap. Sometimes you can use a workaround like a null resource or a custom script. If the gap is critical, consider a different tool.
  • State file conflicts. If you’re testing Terraform and get state locking errors, ensure you’ve configured remote state with locking (e.g., DynamoDB for S3). For local testing, use a separate state file per developer.
  • Team members are struggling with the language. Reassess the choice. If the tool’s language is a barrier, switch to a tool that uses a language your team already knows, even if it means losing some features.
  • Plan/apply is too slow. This is often due to large state or many resources. Optimize by using targeted applies (`-target`) during development, and later refactor into modules.
  • Drift between code and actual infrastructure. Use drift detection features (Terraform plan, CloudFormation drift detection) and schedule regular `plan` runs in CI to catch changes.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between Terraform and Ansible?

Terraform is a declarative provisioning tool that creates and manages cloud resources. Ansible is an imperative configuration management tool that configures software on existing servers. They are often used together: Terraform for the infrastructure, Ansible for setting up the OS and apps.

Is Pulumi better than Terraform?

It depends on your team. Pulumi lets you use general-purpose languages (Python, TypeScript, Go) and offers more flexibility for complex logic, while Terraform has a larger community and more providers. Neither is objectively better; test both.

Do I need to use a cloud-specific tool like CloudFormation?

Only if you are 100% on that cloud and don’t plan to move. CloudFormation is deeply integrated with AWS and handles state for you, but it locks you into AWS. Terraform or Pulumi give you portability.

How do I handle secrets in IaC?

Never hardcode secrets. Use a secret manager (like AWS Secrets Manager, Vault) and reference them via variables or provider features. Tools like Terraform support encrypted state and secret variables in CI/CD.

Can I use IaC for on-premises infrastructure?

Yes. Tools like Terraform have providers for VMware, OpenStack, and other virtualization platforms. Ansible is also a good choice for on-prem because it can manage existing servers without a state file.

What is the best IaC tool for a small team?

For a small team with mixed skills, Terraform is often the safest bet due to its large community, clear documentation, and declarative model. If your team is already fluent in a programming language, Pulumi might be more productive.

Related

Method: the standard formula for this calculation, rounded as each result states. See how the calculators work or report an error.

More cards in this drawer

The whole Numbers and Powers drawer →